top of page

What Went Wrong...

Examining the missteps of various software products across industries reveals common pitfalls that can derail even the most promising innovations. From inadequate market research and poor user experience design to insufficient testing and failure to adapt to technological advancements, these challenges underscore the importance of thorough planning and execution. The following section outlines specific cases, offering insights into how these factors contributed to their downfall and the lessons that can be gleaned to inform future endeavors.

Available Lessons:

200

Coursera Specializations (Early Rollout)

EdTech

Coursera

The initial specialization programs lacked cohesive learning pathways, leading to low course completions.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Poor user experience in connecting courses for skill mastery

  • Weak program structure and unclear outcomes

SIGNALS MISSED

  • Low course completion rates and user feedback

  • Confusion about program progression

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Aligning courses into clear, incremental learning paths

  • Testing program designs with learners before scaling

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Design, Marketing, Customer Success

Udacity Nanodegree Plus

EdTech

Udacity

A premium offering that promised job placement guarantees fell short as students failed to secure employment.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Overpromised outcomes without strong employer partnerships

  • Poor alignment between course content and job market needs

SIGNALS MISSED

  • Feedback indicating course material gaps for employability

  • Low student placement rates flagged early

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Building stronger ties with hiring partners before scaling

  • Aligning course design with employer requirements

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Marketing, Operations, Customer Success

Amplify Tablet Platform

EdTech

Amplify

A tablet-based software solution for classrooms failed due to technical problems and hardware malfunctions, leading to school dissatisfaction.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Hardware-software compatibility issues

  • Poor support for troubleshooting in classrooms

SIGNALS MISSED

  • User complaints during pilot programs

  • Technical breakdowns reported in real-world classroom use

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Testing product performance under classroom conditions

  • Investing in responsive customer support systems

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Engineering, Operations, Customer Success

Smart Sparrow Adaptive Learning Platform

EdTech

Smart Sparrow

The platform struggled with scalability and failed to differentiate itself from competitors like Khan Academy and Coursera.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Poor backend scalability for large deployments

  • Limited user acquisition and retention strategies

SIGNALS MISSED

  • Customer churn during large institutional pilots

  • Slow growth in user adoption metrics

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Improving backend infrastructure for larger deployments

  • Developing competitive features with clear differentiation

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Engineering, Marketing, Sales

Edmodo LMS

EdTech

Edmodo

Despite early success, the platform failed to evolve its business model and product features, leading to a decline in users.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Slow feature updates in response to competition

  • Lack of clear monetization strategy

SIGNALS MISSED

  • Declining user engagement over time

  • Educator frustration over lack of new features

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Developing a sustainable business model

  • Innovating with regular feature updates aligned to user needs

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Marketing, Sales, Design, CEO

MyLab & Mastering (Early Versions)

EdTech

Pearson

The initial versions of Pearson’s learning platforms were riddled with bugs, login failures, and usability challenges.

WHAT WENT WRONG

  • Technical instability and poor scalability

  • Inadequate onboarding for educators

SIGNALS MISSED

  • High support tickets related to login and functionality issues

  • Teachers reporting difficulty integrating with curricula

HOW COULD THEY HAVE AVOIDED THIS

  • Extensive QA testing before scaling

  • User-driven design improvements for classroom integration

TEAMS INVOLVED

Product, Engineering, QA, Customer Success, Operations

Fractional Executives

© 2025 MINDPOP Group

Terms and Conditions 

Thanks for subscribing to the newsletter!!

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page