Must Have
60-90 days, Ongoing
Code Reviews & Quality
Reviewing the codebase to ensure it meets quality standards, is maintainable, and follows best practices. This involves peer reviews, automated tools, and adherence to coding guidelines to catch and fix issues early.
IMPLEMENTATION
Establish coding standards and guidelines that align with industry best practices.
Use version control systems (e.g., Git) to manage code changes and facilitate reviews.
Set up code review processes, including peer reviews and automated code analysis tools.
Assign reviewers for each pull request, ensuring they have the expertise to evaluate the changes.
Review code for readability, maintainability, security, performance, and adherence to guidelines.
Provide constructive feedback and request changes if necessary.
Use automated tools to check for code quality issues, such as linting, static code analysis, and security vulnerabilities.
Integrate continuous integration (CI) systems to automatically run tests on new code.
Track and address technical debt to maintain long-term code health.
TIPS
Foster a culture of constructive feedback and continuous improvement.
Ensure code reviews are thorough but balanced to avoid bottlenecks.
Regularly update coding standards to incorporate new best practices and technologies.
Use pair programming or mob programming sessions to enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Document common code issues and resolutions to streamline future reviews.
WHY IMPORTANT
Crucial for maintaining a high-quality codebase, reducing bugs, and ensuring long-term maintainability.
R
Engineering
A
Engineering
C
Product Management, QA
I
Executive Team, Operations, Customer Support